Agree. Really struggling to avoid links to competitor sites.

when it comes?

You guys should look into integrating Perplexity for this. Perplexity is great at not just fact checking generating articles but also suggesting reference resources and even inserting them properly in the article behind anchor text.

If you guys could work it out, it could boost the quality many fold.

Specially if you guys could offer Claude 3 as an option instead of gpt.

I'd like both - in some ways the 2 go together. When you put "Source Links" you are suggesting this is the only material from which the post is constructed and in reality ChatGPT gets material from everywhere. But the real problem is we are promoting our competitors and so shooting our selves in the foot. "Other sources" is more neutral and more accurate IMHO.

Do you want us to change "source links" to "other sources" or to search for academic sites, can you tell us more details? Thanks.

I'd like to add a bit more to this conversation... let's say you write an article about "Why Montana is a popular place for retirement" I'd love links in my post to news sources that may have written about this topic.

Can the links be contextual in the article content rather than a source link list?