SEOWriting needs to add these features ASAP (thanks!)
under review
Mike Shuey
- The capability to write articles that Generative Search Engines will more likely cite. (GEO vs. SEO)
- Ways to fully fact check of any facts, data, statistics and quotes (I have to do this outside of SEOWriting via Super Agents like Genspark.ai now)
- A way for SEOWriting to provide the complete Schema for every article
- A way for SEOWriting to provide full enhanced metadata for every article
- A way for SEOWriting to provide an FAQ with any unused key terms or phrases from the SEO section for better optimization
- A way for SEOWriting to provide a section of Scholarly resources and studies related to an article topic
- A way to tell SEOWriting to provide data, stats etc. from resources by year or multiple years. Right now Connect to Web doesn't offer that granularity within Source Date.
Federico
I completely agree.
H
Hayat
Don't know why Citations were removed out of nowhere, my entire reason for having this was the citation feature when it was introduced. Then now out of nowhere its gone for no legit reason and the support is coming up with generic responses.
When you guys change such major features, you need to consider the affect and it would have been better if you had a method to discuss that with the users instead of just letting it go because some developer thought it would be a nice idea to just scrap out one of the very features you marketed so heavily on. @seowriting
Federico
Hayat "Don't know why Citations were removed out of nowhere, my entire reason for having this was the citation feature when it was introduced." I agree, that's what I've been asking for months: the reintroduction of a very useful feature that added value and could have been made optional at most. I hope they reintroduce it, as it made SeoWriting unique compared to other web apps and sped up the publishing process.
SEOWriting.AI
under review