FEATURE REQUESTS

Higher AI models should be able to generate better, relevant and more contextual content
This is the first sentence produced by the Sonnet 3.5 model for a post titled "Prepping for 2025": Are you ready for the unpredictable challenges ahead? Prepping for 2025 is more important than ever. The Texas electric grid failures remind us how fast our comforts can disappear. The AI model instantly jumps to provide some random facts and make the content looks weird and awkward. Isn't the advanced models should be able to humanize their content so that we don't have to work twice as hard? And here is another content generated by the advanced model: "Climate change is making natural disasters worse. Economic troubles are also on the horizon, making it crucial to be financially ready. Political events could lead to civil unrest, adding to the uncertainty. To stay safe, you need to learn many skills and build strong community ties. By 2025, innovation will be key for businesses and individuals. Companies will have to match their plans with their goals and find funding for new projects. For preppers, this means keeping up with new tech and updating your plans. Cybersecurity threats are growing, targeting businesses of all sizes. Use strong passwords, multi-factor authentication, and keep your software current. Regular security checks and teaching employees are essential for a strong defense against online threats." Look how abysmal the quality is. It just brings up random sentences that do not flow with one another. You promise a humanized blog content that is of high quality. I don't mind doing some editing but everytime I generate a content, I have to do super duper heavy editing by adding relevant facts and improve the quality of article flow. If you ask people to pay for your software, you should be able to deliver what you promise. So far, what your software produces have been mostly abysmal. This has been an ongoing issues. Random facts should not be popping out of nowhere without a bridge sentences or paragraphs. Fix this please.
8
·

under review

Kind of Article & Repetition
Many other AI writers have an option for picking the kind of output. Content can come in many forms, after all. For instance, General Information, Sales Copy, Reviews, etc. I realize SEO Writing cannot be all things to all people, but I do think having the option to pick the kind of article would help a lot. For example, I tried to have SEOW write a Small-size biographical piece of a famous individual. Let's just say the results weren't very good! I suspect this had something to do with the fact that the tool is not geared for this kind of output. Anyway, if you were able to pick the kind of article up front, I think it would go a long way towards solving a host of issues on the platform. My two cents, anyway. Finally, this goes to another issue I see with SEOW: repetition. I mean, I don't need the output to tell me exactly the same information, phrased slightly differently, in five different places in the article! Further, I've noticed that when the AI has run out of ideas, but needs to reach a certain word minimum, it just starts repeating itself and throws in a lot of "fluff and filler"—much of it just plain ol' bad. This is not good on two levels: 1) it will hurt rankings, if not now then in the future, and 2) I end up having to go in and do extensive manual editing. I don't know exactly how you'd fix these issues, but I do think an already solid tool would only be that much better for it. Personally, I would rather see SEOW deliver a shorter, tighter piece of content than a longer, looser, repetitive one every time. NOTE: My apologies if my concerns here have been voiced elsewhere.
2
·

under review

Load More